From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Burse

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 22, 1979
583 S.W.2d 221 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 40375.

May 22, 1979.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, EDWARD L. SPRAGUE, J.

David M. Johnson, Hayes Heisler, Clayton, for defendant-appellant.

John D. Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Paul Robert Otto and Michael P. Donegan, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.


Criminal case. Defendant was convicted by a jury of attempted robbery first degree and armed criminal action. He received concurrent penitentiary sentences of 8 years and 35 years, respectively.

Defendant claims error in that the state failed to prove the victim was placed in fear. We find no error. Proof that the victim was placed in fear is not an element of attempt to commit robbery first degree. State v. Holliday, 546 S.W.2d 38 (Mo.App. 1976). In any event, defendant's use of a gun in the robbery attempt was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the victim was placed in fear. State v. Dulaney, 428 S.W.2d 593, 595 (Mo. 1968).

We hold that the evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient, that no error of law appears and that an extended opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).

REINHARD, P. J., and GUNN, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Burse

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 22, 1979
583 S.W.2d 221 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

State v. Burse

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DARRYL BURSE…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: May 22, 1979

Citations

583 S.W.2d 221 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

State v. Mulder

Furthermore, the evidence supports a finding the cashier was not placed in fear. Although fear is not an…

Sours v. State

nal action to run concurrently with twenty years for robbery first degree); State v. Gant, 586 S.W.2d 755…