From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Buell

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 28, 1994
70 Ohio St. 3d 1211 (Ohio 1994)

Summary

finding that the right to appointed counsel in Ohio "extends to the first appeal as of right, and no further"

Summary of this case from Sowell v. Collins

Opinion

No. 85-712

Submitted July 27, 1994 —

Decided September 28, 1994.

ON MOTION FOR DELAYED REINSTATEMENT OF APPEAL.

David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, Randall L. Porter and J. Joseph Bodine, Jr., Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.


Appellant, Robert Buell, was convicted of aggravated murder and sentenced to death in 1984. On direct appeal as of right, the court of appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence. State v. Buell (Apr. 11, 1985), Cuyahoga App. No. 48621, unreported, 1985 WL 7955. Buell then appealed as of right to this court, and we also affirmed. State v. Buell (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 124, 22 OBR 203, 489 N.E.2d 795, certiorari denied (1986), 479 U.S. 870, 107 S.Ct. 240, 93 L.Ed.2d 165. Buell then petitioned the trial court for collateral postconviction relief; that petition was denied, and the court of appeals affirmed the denial. State v. Buell (Aug. 22, 1991), Cuyahoga App. No. 57197, unreported. We denied review of that judgment on January 29, 1992. State v. Buell (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 1508, 583 N.E.2d 1320. Next, Buell filed a motion for delayed reconsideration of his direct appeal in the court of appeals, pursuant to App.R. 26 and 14(B), claiming that he had been denied effective assistance of counsel when the court of appeals first considered his case in 1985. (See State v. Murnahan, 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204.) The court of appeals denied reconsideration, State v. Buell (Sept. 21, 1992), Cuyahoga App. No. 31875, unreported, and we affirmed that judgment on November 17, 1993. State v. Buell (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 1500, 622 N.E.2d 649. Buell now claims that he did not receive the effective assistance of counsel in his 1986 direct appeal to this court, and for that reason asks us to reinstate his direct appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XI, Section 1(B).

We deny the motion. Buell's 1986 appeal to this court was his second appeal. "[T]he right to appointed counsel extends to the first appeal as of right, and no further." (Emphasis added.) Pennsylvania v. Finley (1987), 481 U.S. 551, 555, 107 S.Ct. 1990, 1993, 95 L.Ed.2d 539, 545. See, also, Evitts v. Lucey (1985), 469 U.S. 387, 394, 105 S.Ct. 830, 834-835, 83 L.Ed.2d 821, 828. Having no constitutional right to counsel on a second appeal, Buell had no constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel. See Wainwright v. Torna (1982), 455 U.S. 586, 587-588, 102 S.Ct. 1300, 1301, 71 L.Ed.2d 475, 477-478; Evitts, supra, 469 U.S. at 397, 105 S.Ct. at 836, 83 L.Ed.2d at 830, fn. 7.

Motion denied.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

WRIGHT, J., concurs in judgment only.


Summaries of

State v. Buell

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 28, 1994
70 Ohio St. 3d 1211 (Ohio 1994)

finding that the right to appointed counsel in Ohio "extends to the first appeal as of right, and no further"

Summary of this case from Sowell v. Collins

relying on "and no further" to extend the right to counsel only to first appeals as of right

Summary of this case from Simon v. Gov't of Virgin Islands

In State v. Buell, 70 Ohio St. 3d 1211, 639 N.E.2d 110 (1994), the criminal defendant claimed that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel on a further direct appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court after his initial appeal to that state's intermediate appellate court.

Summary of this case from State v. Hughan
Case details for

State v. Buell

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BUELL, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 28, 1994

Citations

70 Ohio St. 3d 1211 (Ohio 1994)
639 N.E.2d 110

Citing Cases

Twyford v. Bradshaw

With respect to Petitioner's argument that the same counsel from the Ohio Public Defender's Office…

State v. Carter

However, Carter had no constitutional right to counsel to pursue an appeal to this court following the court…