From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brokmeyer

Utah Court of Appeals
Nov 2, 2000
2000 UT App. 303 (Utah Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 20000280-CA.

Filed November 2, 2000. (Not For Official Publication)

Appeal from the Seventh District, Monticello Department, The Honorable Lyle R. Anderson.

Rosalie Reilly, Monticello, for Appellant.

Jan Graham and Jeffrey S. Gray, Salt Lake City, and Craig C. Halls, Monticello, for Appellee.

Before Judges Bench, Davis, and Thorne.


MEMORANDUM DECISION


Brokmeyer appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence.

A police officer who stops a vehicle for a traffic violation may ask for a driver's license, insurance, and vehicle registration and may run a computer check based on that information. See State v. Lopez, 873 P.2d 1127, 1132 (Utah 1994). This is what Officer Begay did. He stopped Brokmeyer and a companion because of a broken license plate light and asked them for vehicle registration and for proof of insurance. While they were looking for those documents, Officer Begay saw an illegal mushroom in the truck's ashtray. This gave the officer "reasonable suspicion of more serious criminal activity" and justified his further detention of Brokmeyer. Id. Officer Begay had the parties exit the vehicle and asked if they had drugs, which was in keeping with the requirement that he "`diligently [pursue] a means of investigation that [is] likely to confirm or dispel [his] suspicions quickly.'" State v. Grovier, 808 P.2d 133, 136 (Utah Ct.App. 1991) (alterations in original) (quoting United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 686, 105 S.Ct. 1568, 1575 (1985)). Brokmeyer then admitted that his coat in the truck contained drugs. This was confirmed when the officer searched the truck. The officer's observation of the mushroom in the ashtray, coupled with Brokmeyer's admission, established the probable cause necessary for him to conduct that search. SeeState v. Anderson, 910 P.2d 1229, 1236 (Utah 1996) (requiring probable cause and exigent circumstances for a warrantless search).

Because Brokmeyer did not question whether there were exigent circumstances, we do not address that issue.

Accordingly, the trial court is affirmed.

Russell W. Bench, Judge, James Z. Davis, Judge, William A. Thorne, Jr., Judge


Summaries of

State v. Brokmeyer

Utah Court of Appeals
Nov 2, 2000
2000 UT App. 303 (Utah Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Brokmeyer

Case Details

Full title:State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Don Brokmeyer, Defendant and…

Court:Utah Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 2, 2000

Citations

2000 UT App. 303 (Utah Ct. App. 2000)