From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bristow

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 14, 1985
708 P.2d 649 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

83-1989; CA A35062

Argued and submitted October 22, 1985.

Reversed November 14, 1985.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Coos County, Richard L. Barron, Judge.

Helen I. Bloch, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Terry Leggert, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed.


Defendant appeals his conviction for driving while suspended. He contends that because the suspension was based on a conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants, which was subsequently determined to be void, State v. Bristow, 71 Or. App. 219, 691 P.2d 161 (1984), the suspension order is invalid. The state concedes that defendant is correct. We agree.

Reversed.


Summaries of

State v. Bristow

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 14, 1985
708 P.2d 649 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

State v. Bristow

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBERT DeLANE BRISTOW, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 14, 1985

Citations

708 P.2d 649 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
708 P.2d 649