From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Arvizo

Utah Court of Appeals
Nov 16, 2000
2000 UT App. 325 (Utah Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 20000062-CA.

Filed November 16, 2000. (Not For Official Publication)

Appeal from the Third District, Tooele Department, The Honorable Davis S. Young.

Julie George, Salt Lake City, for Appellant.

Before Judges Bench, Davis, and Thorne.


MEMORANDUM DECISION


Appellant Gilbert Arvizo appeals from his conviction of aggravated assault, a second degree felony. Appointed counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 783, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967) and State v. Clayton, 639 P.2d 168 (Utah 1981). The brief satisfies the requirements of our case law and "objectively demonstrate[s] that the issues raised are frivolous." State v. Flores, 855 P.2d 258, 260 (Utah Ct.App. 1993) (per curiam); see also Dunn v. Cook, 791 P.2d 873, 877 (Utah 1990) (stating an Anders brief must demonstrate any "potentially meritorious" issues are actually frivolous). Counsel also certifies that she reviewed and briefed the grounds for appeal communicated to her by appellant. See State v. Wells, 2000 UT App 304, ¶ 10 (per curiam) (stating counsel must determine and brief any issues appellant seeks to raise prior to filing Anders brief with court).

Appellant has neither responded to, nor objected to, the Anders brief filed by counsel.

Based upon our independent examination of the record, we determine that the appeal is, indeed, wholly frivolous and, accordingly, we affirm the conviction and grant counsel's request to withdraw.

Russell W. Bench, Judge, James Z. Davis, Judge, William A. Thorne, Jr., Judge.


Summaries of

State v. Arvizo

Utah Court of Appeals
Nov 16, 2000
2000 UT App. 325 (Utah Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Arvizo

Case Details

Full title:State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Gilbert Arvizo, Defendant and…

Court:Utah Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 16, 2000

Citations

2000 UT App. 325 (Utah Ct. App. 2000)