From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Albert

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 4, 1999
723 A.2d 810 (Conn. 1999)

Opinion

Decided January 4, 1999


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 715 (AC 15490), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court correctly instructed the jury regarding the meaning of `sexual intercourse' under the facts of this case?"

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16059.

Suzanne Zitser, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Carolyn K. Longstreth, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Albert

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 4, 1999
723 A.2d 810 (Conn. 1999)
Case details for

State v. Albert

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RONALD ALBERT

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 4, 1999

Citations

723 A.2d 810 (Conn. 1999)
247 Conn. 954

Citing Cases

State v. Albert

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: "Did the…