From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 24, 1999
744 So. 2d 600 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

holding that mother's signing of waiver form did not excuse the trial court's failure to advise the juvenile of his right to counsel

Summary of this case from L.D.S.J. v. State

Opinion

No. 97-02682.

Opinion filed November 24, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Dee Anna Farnell, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah F. Hogge, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Appellant, S.S., timely presents several points on appeal, one of which requires reversal and, therefore, relieves us of the necessity of considering the remaining points.

S.S. was charged with battery and appeared for arraignment. The trial judge failed to advise him concerning his right to counsel for representation at arraignment before she accepted a plea of guilty to the charge. The judge did advise S.S. he had a right to counsel in the event he went to trial, and the judge accepted a form signed by S.S. and his mother wherein it was asserted, under oath, that S.S. was entitled to "the right to an attorney, and the right to have an attorney appointed if I cannot afford one[.]" The form itself is insufficient to overcome the arraignment deficiency and does not, in any event, abrogate the responsibility of the trial judge under Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.165. See A.D. v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1494 (Fla. 5th DCA June 25, 1999), and A.P. v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D 1999 (Fla. 5th DCA Aug. 27, 1999).

Counsel was eventually appointed for trial on the issue of whether S.S. was a street gang member pursuant to section 874.04, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996). However, this statute has since been held unconstitutional. See State v. O.C., 24 Fla. L. Weekly S425 (Fla. Sept. 16, 1999). The trial judge's failure to adequately advise S.S. concerning his right to appointment of counsel at the critical stage of arraignment constitutes fundamental error. See J.O. v. State, 717 So.2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

PATTERSON, C.J., and THREADGILL, J., Concur.


Summaries of

S.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 24, 1999
744 So. 2d 600 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

holding that mother's signing of waiver form did not excuse the trial court's failure to advise the juvenile of his right to counsel

Summary of this case from L.D.S.J. v. State
Case details for

S.S. v. State

Case Details

Full title:S.S., a child, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 24, 1999

Citations

744 So. 2d 600 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

State v. T.G.

Further, courts have consistently reversed adjudications of delinquency for failure to comply with rule…

L.D.S.J. v. State

This unidentified person cannot be said, to have been a parent, legal custodian, responsible adult relative,…