concluding that "the mere avail-ability of defendant's offered stipulation as an alternate form of proof did not render" post-mortem photographs of the victim irrelevant
Summary of this case from State v. EzellNo. 04-5324.
October 4, 2004.
Certiorari Denied. (See also No. 03-10259, supra.).
Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 336 Ore. 298, 83 P. 3d 304.
concluding that "the mere avail-ability of defendant's offered stipulation as an alternate form of proof did not render" post-mortem photographs of the victim irrelevant
Summary of this case from State v. Ezellconcluding that, because post-mortem photographs were relevant to prove more than the defendant stipulated, the trial court did not err in declining to limit the state to the defendant’s stipulation
Summary of this case from State v. Brownexplaining that a defendant's stipulation is an alternate form of proof but does "not have the effect of making otherwise relevant evidence irrelevant"
Summary of this case from State v. AllenFull title:SPARKS v. OREGON
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 4, 2004
That holding was based not only on the other information given to the jury, but also on the state of the law…
State v. SerranoSee, e.g., State v. Sparks, 336 Or. 298, 323–24, 83 P.3d 304,cert. den.,543 U.S. 893, 125 S.Ct. 219, 160…