From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southside Vir. Telecasting v. Fed. Commun

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Dec 29, 1955
228 F.2d 644 (D.C. Cir. 1955)

Opinion

No. 12546.

Argued October 11, 1955.

Decided December 29, 1955. Writ of Certiorari Denied March 26, 1956. See 76 S.Ct. 546.

Messrs. Leonard H. Marks, Washington, D.C., and Paul Dobin, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Richard A. Solomon, Assistant General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, with whom Messrs. Warren E. Baker, General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, J. Smith Henley, Asst. General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, and Daniel R. Ohlbaum, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. Stanley S. Neustadt, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, New York City, also entered an appearance for appellee.

Messrs. Paul A. Porter, Harry M. Plotkin and Reed Miller, Washington, D.C., filed a brief for intervenor. Mr. George Bunn, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for intervenor.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WILBUR K. MILLER and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.


The appellant and the intervenor each applied to the Federal Communications Commission for a construction permit for a television station in Petersburg, Virginia. After a comparative hearing the Commission denied the appellant's application and granted the intervenor's. We do not find that the Commission ignored factors that required consideration or acted arbitrarily in choosing between the applicants.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Southside Vir. Telecasting v. Fed. Commun

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Dec 29, 1955
228 F.2d 644 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
Case details for

Southside Vir. Telecasting v. Fed. Commun

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHSIDE VIRGINIA TELECASTING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. FEDERAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Dec 29, 1955

Citations

228 F.2d 644 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
97 U.S. App. D.C. 130

Citing Cases

Stone v. F.C.C.

Suburban and other outlying area are not cities of license, although their needs and interests must be met by…

Fidelity Television, Inc. v. F.C.C

What factual allegations does the Commission want? Even if some answer to this riddle would appear, and none…