From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southern California Edison Co. v. Lynch

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 30, 2002
307 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

Nos. 01-56879, 01-56993, 01-57020.

September 30, 2002.


ORDER


The parties and amici are directed to file four (4) copies of all briefs and two (2) copies of excerpts of record with the U.S. Court of Appeals, rather than the Supreme Court of California, within ten (10) days. This order supercedes the directions to the parties provided in the certification order previously issued by this Court.

The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to transmit, under the official seal of the Ninth Circuit, a copy of this order, the Request for Certification, and copies of all briefs and excerpts of record submitted to this Court to the Supreme Court of California.

The Clerk of Court is further directed to withhold issuance of the mandate and entry of judgment until further order of the Court. Further action of this case is stayed pending a response to the certification request from the California Supreme Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Southern California Edison Co. v. Lynch

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 30, 2002
307 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 2002)
Case details for

Southern California Edison Co. v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Loretta M…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 30, 2002

Citations

307 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 2002)

Citing Cases

Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency

To merit intervention as of right, the interest must be "direct, non-contingent, substantial and legally…

Lighthouse Res. Inc. v. Inslee

Rule 24(a)(2) provides for intervention as a matter of right. Intervenors have the burden to show: (1) the…