From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 24, 1983
436 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. AR-156.

August 24, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, A.C. Soud, Jr., J.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and James T. Miller, Asst. Public Defender, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Barbara Ann Butler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jacksonville, for appellee.


This cause is before us on appeal from a judgment and sentence for felony petit theft, in which appellant makes several assertions of error. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in refusing to give a jury instruction on abandonment. A defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on the theory of his defense if there is evidence in the record to support it, regardless of how weak or improbable it may be. Holley v. State, 423 So.2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). We find no merit to appellant's other assertions.

This cause is reversed and remanded for new trial.

BOOTH, WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Solomon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 24, 1983
436 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Solomon v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE GEORGE SOLOMON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 24, 1983

Citations

436 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

White v. State

We are compelled to agree with Appellant that the evidence, if accepted by the jury, could support a verdict…

Verdult v. State

We reverse on the basis that the trial court should have given Verdult's requested jury instruction on his…