From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soler v. Ribicoff

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 15, 1962
223 F. Supp. 472 (S.D.N.Y. 1962)

Summary

In Soler v. Ribicoff, 223 F. Supp. 472 (S.D.N.Y. 1960), the Court rejected the plaintiff's contention that it was improper for the Appeals Council to refer to medical texts of recognized authority.

Summary of this case from McDaniel v. Celebrezze

Opinion

February 15, 1962.

Gordon Miller, New York City, for plaintiff.

Robert M. Morganthau, U.S. Atty., by John Hanna, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, for defendant.


Plaintiff brings an action under § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended ( 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)) for review of the final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying plaintiff's claim for a period of disability. The defendant moves, pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for judgment on the pleadings in accordance with § 205(g).

The sole question before this Court is whether the final decision of the defendant's predecessor is supported by substantial evidence. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Jacobson v. Flemming, 186 F. Supp. 936 (S.D.N.Y. 1960); Healey v. Folsom, 139 F. Supp. 285, 287 (S.D.N.Y. 1955). If there is a substantial basis for the Secretary's findings, then the finality of his decision extends to the inferences and conclusions drawn from the evidence. Adams v. Flemming, 276 F.2d 901, 903 (2d Cir. 1960).

The Secretary's decision is embodied in a lengthy and exhaustive opinion by the Appeals Council of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare dated November 18th, 1960. The Council considered the evidence originally before the hearing examiner, as well as the additional evidence presented by plaintiff. In its opinion the Council made reference to medical treatises of recognized authority. Plaintiff's contention that this was improper is without merit. Medical, and other treatises are regularly resorted to for guidance in both the judicial and administrative processes.

After careful consideration of the whole record, I find there is substantial evidence to support the decision of the defendant. Therefore, the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. The plaintiff's complaint as amended is dismissed.

Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Soler v. Ribicoff

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 15, 1962
223 F. Supp. 472 (S.D.N.Y. 1962)

In Soler v. Ribicoff, 223 F. Supp. 472 (S.D.N.Y. 1960), the Court rejected the plaintiff's contention that it was improper for the Appeals Council to refer to medical texts of recognized authority.

Summary of this case from McDaniel v. Celebrezze
Case details for

Soler v. Ribicoff

Case Details

Full title:Antonio SOLER v. Abraham A. RIBICOFF, Secretary of Health, Education and…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Feb 15, 1962

Citations

223 F. Supp. 472 (S.D.N.Y. 1962)

Citing Cases

Miller v. Celebrezze

The question then is clear: Did defendant have substantial evidence to support its determination that the…

McDaniel v. Celebrezze

"* * * A chief value of the administrative procedure is the expertise of the examiners and the range of…