From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snide v. Disc. Drug Mart, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 21, 2013
CASE NO. 1:11 CV 00244 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 21, 2013)

Summary

reducing fee request by 50%

Summary of this case from Fulkerson v. Yaskawa Am., Inc.

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11 CV 00244

11-21-2013

JOANNE SNIDE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISCOUNT DRUG MART, INC., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING

IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE LESLEY WELLS

After the parties' collective action settlement received court approval, the plaintiffs filed a motion under seal for attorney fees and costs, which was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Greg White for report and recommendation ("R&R"). On 30 October 2013, Magistrate Judge White issued an R&R recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. The parties have not objected to the recommendation.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which a timely objection is made. Therefore, the Magistrate Judge's recommendation is accepted. The plaintiffs motion for attorney fees and costs is granted in part and denied in part, as set forth in the R&R.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Snide v. Disc. Drug Mart, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 21, 2013
CASE NO. 1:11 CV 00244 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 21, 2013)

reducing fee request by 50%

Summary of this case from Fulkerson v. Yaskawa Am., Inc.
Case details for

Snide v. Disc. Drug Mart, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOANNE SNIDE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISCOUNT DRUG MART, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 21, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11 CV 00244 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 21, 2013)

Citing Cases

Toliver v. JBS Plainwell, Inc.

If the Court has discretion to apply a 50% reduction across-the-board for "limited success," it certainly has…

Hines v. DeWitt

An adjustment due to lack of success usually takes the form of an across-the-board reduction of some…