From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 21, 1977
235 S.E.2d 44 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

53680.

SUBMITTED APRIL 11, 1977.

DECIDED APRIL 21, 1977.

Aggravated assault. Dooley Superior Court. Before Judge Gregory.

A. Frank Grimsley, for appellant. D. E. Turk, District Attorney, Gary C. Christy, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


The defendant appeals from his conviction of aggravated assault.

On the evening of November 1, 1975, the defendant and Willie Kendrick were present in a bar in Dooly County. The defendant was having a tete-a-tete with a woman for whom Mr. Kendrick apparently had some affection. Mr. Kendrick approached the defendant from behind without a weapon and said, "Well, y'all ain't got to talk so low. Y'all can talk out." The defendant spun around on his bar stool and stabbed Mr. Kendrick. The defendant claimed that he acted in self-defense, believing that Kendrick might have a knife.

The defendant challenges the jury verdict on general grounds. The questions of whether the victim's actions were sufficient provocation for the attack or whether the defendant was justified in believing it necessary to use deadly force in self-defense are within the province of the jury to decide. See Jeffers v. State, 129 Ga. App. 712 ( 201 S.E.2d 161) (1973); Amerson v. State, 18 Ga. App. 176 ( 88 S.E. 998) (1916). The evidence was sufficient to sustain a verdict, which will therefore be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. Quillian, P. J., and Shulman, J., concur.

SUBMITTED APRIL 11, 1977 — DECIDED APRIL 21, 1977.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 21, 1977
235 S.E.2d 44 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 21, 1977

Citations

235 S.E.2d 44 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
235 S.E.2d 44

Citing Cases

Russell v. State

Since the evidence presented at trial upholds the state's assertion that defendant fired his weapon at the…

Hutchins v. State

Whether appellant was justified in believing it necessary to use deadly force in self-defense was a question…