From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 20, 1998
720 So. 2d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 98-481.

October 9, 1998. Rehearing Denied November 20, 1998.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County; Charles M. Holcomb, Judge.

Clinton Bruce Smith, Sanderson, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Smith appeals from a denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. He presents one issue: that in his 1989 sentencing the trial court erred in relying on two convictions, which were not proven with certified or verified documents. We affirm.

First, this is an issue which should have been raised in Smith's direct appeal and thus unless there are exceptional circumstances (which there are not in this case), it cannot be raised in a collateral attack on the judgment. Straight v. State, 488 So.2d 530 (Fla. 1986). Second, Smith concedes he raised this issue in both a 3.800(a) motion and in a 3.850 motion, which were denied. Therefore, Smith's raising the same issue in this case is improper because it is successive. Scott v. State, 656 So.2d 204 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Holmes v. State, 669 So.2d 360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 20, 1998
720 So. 2d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Clinton B. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 20, 1998

Citations

720 So. 2d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)