From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 9, 2001
785 So. 2d 671 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 4D01-1326.

Opinion filed May 9, 2001.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-2665 CFA.

Timothy Smith, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's order denying Appellant's motion to correct sentence through which he sought relief pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant filing, if appropriate, a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 on his claim that his plea was entered pursuant to a negotiated agreement under which he was to receive a downward departure sentence. Cf. Jenkins v. State, 771 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (determining that rule 3.850 was the proper vehicle for claim of entitlement to re-sentencing or to withdrawal of plea where plea allegedly was entered pursuant negotiated agreement in which defendant was to receive a mid-guidelines sentence as a habitual offender).

Stone, Farmer, and Hazouri, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 9, 2001
785 So. 2d 671 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 9, 2001

Citations

785 So. 2d 671 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)