From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 16, 1986
492 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-2846.

July 16, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Harry G. Hinckley, Jr., Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Noel A. Pelella, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We previously reversed and remanded because we concluded that only one of the grounds recited by the trial court for revocation of appellant's probation was valid. Williams v. State, 475 So.2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). On remand, the trial court, based on the evidence at the prior hearing, came to the same conclusion, and sentenced appellant. It failed to enter a formal order of revocation of probation. Appellant claims error because the trial court would not allow a second evidentiary hearing. We hold that it was not necessary for it to do so as appellant was given an opportunity to explain his failure to file monthly reports at the initial hearing. Accordingly, we affirm but remand with direction to enter a formal order of revocation of probation, nunc pro tunc December 9, 1985.

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 16, 1986
492 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EDWARD SMITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 16, 1986

Citations

492 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Pickett v. State

We, accordingly, affirm, but remand for the entry of a formal written order revoking Pickett's probation. See…

Hornberger v. State

We reverse the orders placing appellant on community control and probation and remand with instructions to…