From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 12, 1995
661 So. 2d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-3625.

October 12, 1995.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County; Clinton Foster, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Carl C. McGinnes, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Stephen R. White, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


We have for review the judgments and sentences in three cases. The sentencing order in case 94-408 imposes costs upon Gerald Devon Smith for each count on which he was convicted. It was error to impose costs for each count; costs must be imposed on a per-case basis. Hunter v. State, 651 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

We thus reverse the costs' award in case 94-408, and remand for consistent proceedings. We affirm the judgments and sentences in all other respects.

ERVIN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 12, 1995
661 So. 2d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:GERALD DEVON SMITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 12, 1995

Citations

661 So. 2d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

McNeil v. State

e § 775.021(1), Fla. Stat. (2016) ; McNeil , 162 So.3d at 277 (Sawaya, J., dissenting) ("The courts have held…

McNeil v. State

”); Seeker v. State, 674 So.2d 853, 853 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (“Because the trial court imposed costs on a per…