From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SMITH v. BUSS

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Feb 28, 2011
Case No. 3:09cv278/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09cv278/MCR/EMT.

February 28, 2011


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 4, 2011. (Doc. 40). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Petitioner's attempts to amend his habeas petition to add the claims asserted in his Reply (doc. 25) and his Proposed Second Amended Petition ( see doc. 33, attachment) are DENIED as futile, since they are time barred.

3. Petitioner's First Amended Petition (doc. 7) is DENIED.

4 A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

5. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of February, 2011.


Summaries of

SMITH v. BUSS

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Feb 28, 2011
Case No. 3:09cv278/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 28, 2011)
Case details for

SMITH v. BUSS

Case Details

Full title:TERRY D. SMITH, Petitioner, v. EDWIN G. BUSS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Feb 28, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:09cv278/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 28, 2011)

Citing Cases

Overton v. Jones

The Northern District of Florida appears divided on this issue. See Smith v. Buss, 2011 WL 818157…

Green v. Tucker

However, when the post-conviction court struck the motion on December 11, 2008, the first Rule 3.850 motion…