From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Board of Trustees of University of Florida

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Mar 10, 2006
Case No. 1:04cv106-SPM/AK (N.D. Fla. Mar. 10, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:04cv106-SPM/AK.

March 10, 2006


ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO CONFER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE


Upon review of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (doc. 87), it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. On or before March 15, 2006, counsel of record for Defendant shall meet with general counsel for Defendant and Drs. Russell Robinson and John Duff to discuss the allegations of retaliation raised in Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction.

2. On or before March 17, 2006, counsel for each party shall confer with each other in a good faith effort to resolve this matter.

3. If the parties are unable to resolve this matter, Defendant shall file, on or before March 21, 2006, a showing of good cause in writing why a preliminary injunction should not be issued.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Board of Trustees of University of Florida

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Mar 10, 2006
Case No. 1:04cv106-SPM/AK (N.D. Fla. Mar. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Smith v. Board of Trustees of University of Florida

Case Details

Full title:CAMILLE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Mar 10, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:04cv106-SPM/AK (N.D. Fla. Mar. 10, 2006)

Citing Cases

Zoroastrian Ctr. & Darb-E-Mehr of Metro. Wash. v. Rustam Guiv Found.

Doing so transforms the appellate fee petition into a sword of Damocles hanging over the losing party for as…