From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith Barney Harris Upham Co. v. Luckie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1993
198 A.D.2d 87 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 16, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Norman Ryp, J.).


The parties' intention to resolve all disputes by arbitration being clear, dismissal of respondent's claims pursuant to CPLR 7502 (b) would defeat the policies of the Federal Arbitration Act ( 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.; see, Volt Information Sciences v Stanford Univ., 489 U.S. 468, 479). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of petitioner's application on the ground that the arbitrators should decide the Statute of Limitations issue, including whether New York or Florida law applies.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ellerin, Wallach, Kassal and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Smith Barney Harris Upham Co. v. Luckie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1993
198 A.D.2d 87 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Smith Barney Harris Upham Co. v. Luckie

Case Details

Full title:SMITH BARNEY HARRIS UPHAM Co., INC., Appellant, v. CHARLIE LUCKIE, JR., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 87 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 838

Citing Cases

Matter of Prudential Securities Incorporated

The FAA governs, and supplants all State law inconsistent with its express provisions, in proceedings…

Matter of Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith

The parties' intention to resolve all disputes by arbitration is made clear by the agreement to arbitrate. In…