From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slaughter v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 8, 1990
557 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 1990)

Opinion

No. 73743.

March 8, 1990.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, First District — Case No. 88-262 (Alachua County).

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer and Paula S. Saunders, Asst. Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and A.E. (Ned) Pooser, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.


We accepted Slaughter v. State, 538 So.2d 509 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), for review based on apparent conflict with Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1987). Upon examination of the record and consideration of argument by counsel, we have determined that jurisdiction was granted improvidently. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THIS COURT.


Summaries of

Slaughter v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 8, 1990
557 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 1990)
Case details for

Slaughter v. State

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS WAYNE SLAUGHTER, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 8, 1990

Citations

557 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 1990)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

Therefore, conviction and punishment for each charge was appropriate. See Slaughter v. State, 538 So.2d 509…

Wilcoxson v. State

According to the state, the appellant's presumptive sentence, therefore, should be 17-22 years, thereby…