From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skubal v. Cooley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 27, 1994
639 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2249.

July 27, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Patti Englander Henning, Judge.

Howard A. Tescher of Kipnis, Tescher, Lippman, Valinsly Kain, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Joseph A. Hubert, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.


By granting appellees' motion for judgment on the pleadings, the trial court entered a final order dismissing appellant Skubal's counterclaim. To so rule, the court considered factual matters outside the pleadings. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.100(a) (defining "pleadings"). A motion for judgment on the pleadings under rule 1.140(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure must be decided on the pleadings, without reference to facts which may be properly considered under other procedural vehicles. E.g., J J Utility Co. v. Windmill Village by the Sea Condominium No. I Ass'n, 485 So.2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Accordingly, the order appealed from is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., and GROSS, ROBERT M., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Skubal v. Cooley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 27, 1994
639 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Skubal v. Cooley

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS L. SKUBAL, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM O. COOLEY AND ARTHUR J. PETRIE, AS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 27, 1994

Citations

639 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Ray v. Elks Lodge # 1870 of Stuart

The motion must be decided on the pleadings without reference to facts which may be properly considered under…