From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sivak v. Brady-Spencer Management Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 31, 1991
590 So. 2d 944 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

In Sivak, the court held that the agent of a party to a contract does not have standing to sue on behalf of the person who entered the contract.

Summary of this case from McNEELY v. BERK

Opinion

No. 90-2653.

September 19, 1991. Rehearing Denied December 31, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Joseph P. Baker, J.

Robert W. Smith, Orlando, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


Taking the facts in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff, Maria de Restrepo, a resident of Ecuador, entered into a real estate contract with Defendant for the purchase of Unit 52 in Phase 4 of Fantasy World Club Villas. De Restrepo then assigned the contract to Anna Andrade who was also a resident of Ecuador. Thereafter, Andrade gave Plaintiff a Power of Attorney designating Plaintiff her attorney-in-fact ". . . to do and perform all and every act . . . concerning that certain contract for sale and purchase of Unit 52, Phase IV . . . including the recovery of the deposit. . . ."

Plaintiff sued Defendant in her alleged capacity as Andrade's "successor in interest." In Count I, Plaintiff alleged that the underlying real estate transaction was voidable because the Defendant had failed to comply with Chapter 498, Florida Statutes; and in Count II Plaintiff alleged that the Defendant had breached the contract. After a bench trial, the trial judge entered Final Judgment in favor of the Defendant on both counts of the Complaint.

We affirm. In this case the trial court was correct because the Plaintiff lacked standing to maintain the action on her own behalf. See, e.g., De Toro v. Dervan Investments Limited Corp., 483 So.2d 717 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Rauch, Weaver, Millsaps, Bigelow Company v. Central Bank and Trust Company, 453 So.2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Schurkman v. Stolar, 347 So.2d 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The evidence established that she was not Andrade's "successor in interest" as she had alleged, but merely Andrade's agent by virtue of the Power of Attorney. Andrade may well be aggrieved; however, only Andrade, or the Plaintiff in her representative capacity, may maintain the action.

A Power of Attorney is a written authorization to an agent to perform some act on behalf of the principal. 3 Am.Jur.2d Agency § 23.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sivak v. Brady-Spencer Management Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 31, 1991
590 So. 2d 944 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

In Sivak, the court held that the agent of a party to a contract does not have standing to sue on behalf of the person who entered the contract.

Summary of this case from McNEELY v. BERK
Case details for

Sivak v. Brady-Spencer Management Co.

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN SIVAK, APPELLANT, v. BRADY-SPENCER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 31, 1991

Citations

590 So. 2d 944 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

McNEELY v. BERK

For the reasons already explained the Court finds the plaintiffs have standing. The defendants cited to Sivak…

Superior Insurance Co. v. Libert

A person who is named an agent for the purpose of collecting money and who is authorized to commence legal…