From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singleton v. Duncan

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jan 10, 2006
No. 03-CV-0561 (ARR) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2006)

Summary

holding simple disagreements over trial strategies or tactics, alone, do not merit ineffective counsel

Summary of this case from Reyes v. Ercole

Opinion

No. 03-CV-0561 (ARR).

January 10, 2006


JUDGMENT


An Order of Honorable Allyne R. Ross, United States District Judge, having been filed on January 10, 2006, denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus; and ordering that no Certificate of Appealability is granted with respect to any of the petitioner's claims; it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that petitioner take nothing of the respondent; that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied; and that no Certificate of Appealability is granted with respect to any of the petitioner's claims.


Summaries of

Singleton v. Duncan

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jan 10, 2006
No. 03-CV-0561 (ARR) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2006)

holding simple disagreements over trial strategies or tactics, alone, do not merit ineffective counsel

Summary of this case from Reyes v. Ercole

holding simple disagreements over trial strategies or tactics, alone, do not merit ineffective counsel

Summary of this case from Freeman v. Burge
Case details for

Singleton v. Duncan

Case Details

Full title:REGINAL SINGLETON, Petitioner, v. GEORGE DUNCAN, Superintendent, Great…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Jan 10, 2006

Citations

No. 03-CV-0561 (ARR) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2006)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Bradt

See Williams, 2008 WL 4179475, at *7 ("A petitioner cannot prevail under a theory of ineffective assistance…

Wang v. United States

"[A] petitioner cannot prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance merely because he disagrees with his…