From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shores v. Wegmann

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 18, 1979
370 So. 2d 87 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. LL-81.

May 1, 1979. Rehearing Denied May 18, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Washington County, W.L. Bailey, J.

Paul G. Komarek of Mann Komarek, P.A., Lynn Haven, for appellant.

J. Robert Hughes of Barron, Redding, Boggs Hughes, Panama City, for appellee.


Shores appeals a final summary judgment entered in favor of appellee, Dr. Wegmann. Shores argues that summary judgment was not proper because appellee failed to conclusively show that Wegmann exercised the degree of skill or care consistent with the standards of his community or of a comparable community in rendering medical care to the decedent. We agree and reverse.

A careful reading of the record shows that it is silent with regard to whether Wegmann exercised the degree of skill required to preclude liability. A record that is silent on a determinative issue of fact forecloses summary judgment, for the movant's burden is to show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Glass v. Camara, 369 So.2d 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Reversed and Remanded.

MELVIN, Acting C.J., and BOOTH and LARRY SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shores v. Wegmann

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 18, 1979
370 So. 2d 87 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Shores v. Wegmann

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD RICHARD SHORES, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JESSIE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 18, 1979

Citations

370 So. 2d 87 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Valcin v. Public Health Trust

While it will be Valcin's burden at trial to establish through expert testimony that an ectopic pregnancy is…

Langner v. Charles A. Binger, Inc.

The issue of negligence is usually not properly resolved by summary judgment. Shores v. Wegmann, 370 So.2d 87…