From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sherman v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA DANVILLE DIVISION
Jul 8, 2014
Case No. 4:13-cv-00020 (W.D. Va. Jul. 8, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 4:13-cv-00020

07-08-2014

THURSTIE SHERMAN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Before me is the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") of United States Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe [ECF No. 22], recommending that an Order be entered granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment/Motion for Remand [ECF No. 16], denying the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 19], and remanding the case for further administrative proceedings. The R & R was filed on June 19, 2014, from which date the parties had fourteen (14) days to file objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (2013). No objections were filed. Accordingly, it this day ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the R & R shall be, and hereby is, ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment/Motion for Remand is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the R & R.

The Clerk is directed to DISMISS this case from the active docket of the Court, and to send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record as well as to Magistrate Judge Hoppe.

ENTERED this 8th day of July, 2014.

s/Jackson L. Kiser

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sherman v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA DANVILLE DIVISION
Jul 8, 2014
Case No. 4:13-cv-00020 (W.D. Va. Jul. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Sherman v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:THURSTIE SHERMAN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA DANVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jul 8, 2014

Citations

Case No. 4:13-cv-00020 (W.D. Va. Jul. 8, 2014)

Citing Cases

Watzman v. Colvin

Although the ALJ found that this work activity did not rise to the level of substantial gainful activity at…

Jennings v. Berryhill

Reversal and remand is required where "the new evidence 'is contradictory, presents material competing…