Opinion
No. 2:20-cv-00944-TLN-EFB
10-06-2020
JANAVI SHARMA, Plaintiff, v. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Plaintiff Janavi Sharma ("Plaintiff"), who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On September 3, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 3.) On September 15, 2020, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 4.)
This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the Court assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
Having carefully reviewed the entire file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed September 3, 2020 (ECF No. 3), are adopted in full;
2. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 6, 2020
/s/_________
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge