explaining the procedural rule's utility in identifying issues appropriate for trial
Summary of this case from Mainstay Fisheries, Inc. v. N. Waterfront Assocs., L.P.No. 2009-316-Appeal.
May 16, 2011.
Appeal from the Superior Court, Providence Country, Partrcia A. Hurst, J.
Neil P. Philbin, Esq., Peace Dale, for Plaintiff.
Melina J. Mannix, Esq., Warwick, for Defendant.
Present: SUTTELL, C.J., GOLDBERG, FLAHERTY, ROBINSON, and INDEGLIA, JJ.
explaining the procedural rule's utility in identifying issues appropriate for trial
Summary of this case from Mainstay Fisheries, Inc. v. N. Waterfront Assocs., L.P.Full title:Virginia SHARKEY v. George M. PRESCOTT et al
Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Date published: May 16, 2011
3(2), "serves ‘to protect individuals suffering from latent or undiscoverable injuries who then seek legal…
Browne v. MageeAs explained by our Supreme Court, the proper procedure is to have the parties present the material facts "at…