From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shame on You Prods., Inc. v. Banks

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 3, 2017
No. 15-56372 (9th Cir. May. 3, 2017)

Opinion

No. 15-56372

05-03-2017

SHAME ON YOU PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELIZABETH BANKS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:14-cv-03512-MMM-JC MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 6, 2017 Pasadena, California Before: PLAGER, CLIFTON, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The Honorable S. Jay Plager, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. --------

Shame on You Productions, Inc. ("SOYP") appeals the district court's order and judgment dismissing SOYP's federal copyright infringement claim and California state law implied-in-fact contract claim. On the basis of the thorough and well-reasoned order of the district court, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Shame on You Prods., Inc. v. Banks

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 3, 2017
No. 15-56372 (9th Cir. May. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Shame on You Prods., Inc. v. Banks

Case Details

Full title:SHAME ON YOU PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELIZABETH BANKS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 3, 2017

Citations

No. 15-56372 (9th Cir. May. 3, 2017)

Citing Cases

Stuart v. City of San Antonio

The Fifth Circuit has not clarified what "closed" means for purposes of Rule 12(c), but some courts in other…

Shame on You Prods., Inc. v. Banks

The court held that as a matter of law there was no substantial similarity between the two works, dismissed…