From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Serr v. Sullivan

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 1, 1968
390 F.2d 619 (3d Cir. 1968)

Opinion

Nos. 16908-16914.

Argued February 20, 1968.

Decided March 1, 1968.

Philip Wilens, Head, Statutory Enforcement Unit, Criminal Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Drew J.T. O'Keefe, U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant. Charles Ruff, Robert Gary, Attys., Dept. of Justice, John W. Coggins, Director, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Legal Division, Office of Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

James H. McGlothlin, Washington, D.C.

Pepper, Hamilton Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., Richard A. Brady, William A. Dobrovir, Covington Burling, Washington, D.C., Philip H. Strubing, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee Hiram Walker Incorporated.

H. Francis DeLone, Richard G. Schneider, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee-witnesses: Sullivan, Deimeyer, Curran, Letizia, Wheatley, DeWilde.

Russell E. Ellis, Norristown, Pa., for appellee-witness: Mortensen.

Before KALODNER, FREEDMAN and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Is the Director of the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division, Internal Revenue Service, empowered by the Federal Alcohol Administration Act, 27 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., to conduct a special investigation of a permittee of the Division with the power to compel witnesses to appear and testify?

The District Court answered the question in the negative in the instant case in denying the Director's petitions for enforcement of his subpoenas duces tecum directed to the appellees in the course of his investigation of the Division's permittee, Hiram Walker Incorporated.

We are of the view that the District Court did not err in holding that the Federal Alcohol Administration Act did not in § 2(g), or any other section, expressly or impliedly empower the Director of the Alcohol and Tobacco Division to conduct special investigation of the Division's permittees and to issue subpoenas duces tecum pursuant thereto.

The District Court's Order denying the petitions to enforce the Director's subpoenas will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in Judge John W. Lord's excellent opinion reported at 270 F. Supp. 544 (E.D.Pa. 1967).


Summaries of

Serr v. Sullivan

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 1, 1968
390 F.2d 619 (3d Cir. 1968)
Case details for

Serr v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:Harold A. SERR, Director Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division Internal Revenue…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Mar 1, 1968

Citations

390 F.2d 619 (3d Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

United States v. Hill

FTC v. Browning, 435 F.2d at 100 (discussed in note 10 supra). See also General Tobacco Grocery Co. v.…

Sealed Air Corp v. U.S. Intern. Trade Com'n

Each of these powers must be found separately in the legislative grant. An agency can be challenged if it…