From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Searcy v. Gardner

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Feb 11, 2008
Civil No. 3:07-0361 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 11, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:07-0361.

February 11, 2008


ORDER


On January 7, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation. (Docket No. 32) No timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss and For Summary Judgment (Docket No. 22) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all defendants.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Searcy v. Gardner

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Feb 11, 2008
Civil No. 3:07-0361 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 11, 2008)
Case details for

Searcy v. Gardner

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH SEARCY, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN GARDNER, Warden, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Feb 11, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 3:07-0361 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 11, 2008)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Causey

For a "class of one" to prove a violation of the Equal Protection Clause, a plaintiff must allege that he…

Wiley v. KDOC

Johnson v. Unknown Dellatifa, 357 F.3d 539, 546 (6th Cir. 2004); Violett v. Reynolds, 76 F. App'x 24, 27 (6th…