From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schnakenberg v. U.S.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Nov 5, 2010
No. 4:08-CV-1870 CAS (E.D. Mo. Nov. 5, 2010)

Opinion

No. 4:08-CV-1870 CAS.

November 5, 2010


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the motion of Eric Dean Schnakenberg, a federal prisoner, to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Movant pleaded guilty to one count of possessing child pornography and was sentenced to a term of 36 months in prison followed by 20 years supervised release. No direct appeal was filed. As grounds for § 2255 relief, movant claims his counsel was ineffective in that he did not file an appeal as movant instructed. Pursuant to the directive of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Watson v. U.S., 493 F.3d 960 (8th Cir. 2007), an evidentiary hearing is necessary to determine whether Mr. Schnakenberg indeed requested his attorney to file an appeal.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an evidentiary hearing shall be held at the Thomas F. Eagleton Courthouse in Saint Louis, Missouri on Thursday, January 20, 2011, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 12-N to determine whether movant instructed his trial counsel to file an appeal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that JoAnn Trog, 121 W. Adams, St. Louis, Missouri 63122, telephone number (314) 821-1111, is hereby appointed as counsel for movant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall provide appointed counsel with a copy of the complete Court file.

Dated this 5th day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

Schnakenberg v. U.S.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Nov 5, 2010
No. 4:08-CV-1870 CAS (E.D. Mo. Nov. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Schnakenberg v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC DEAN SCHNAKENBERG, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 5, 2010

Citations

No. 4:08-CV-1870 CAS (E.D. Mo. Nov. 5, 2010)

Citing Cases

Brown v. Department of the Navy

Our task, by contrast, is to determine whether the Board's finding is supported by substantial evidence,…