From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scheckel v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Aug 21, 2013
838 N.W.2d 870 (Iowa Ct. App. 2013)

Summary

stating that “the right to travel does not give an individual the right to travel at their discretion with disregard to the traffic laws”

Summary of this case from Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids

Opinion

No. 12–2295.

2013-08-21

Elmer SCHECKEL, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa and City of Oelwein, Defendant–Appellees.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Fayette County, Margaret L. Lingreen (State's motion to dismiss) and Richard D. Stochl (City's motion to dismiss), Judges. An Iowa resident challenges the constitutionality of his various motor vehicle citations. AFFIRMED. Elmer Scheckel, Oelwein, pro se. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Meghan Gavin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.



Summaries of

Scheckel v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Aug 21, 2013
838 N.W.2d 870 (Iowa Ct. App. 2013)

stating that “the right to travel does not give an individual the right to travel at their discretion with disregard to the traffic laws”

Summary of this case from Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids
Case details for

Scheckel v. State

Case Details

Full title:Elmer SCHECKEL, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa and City of Oelwein…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Aug 21, 2013

Citations

838 N.W.2d 870 (Iowa Ct. App. 2013)

Citing Cases

Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids

The drivers assert they have a right to intrastate travel under the Iowa Constitution. They cite no Iowa law…