From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scarpa v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 8, 2018
138 S. Ct. 692 (2018)

Summary

reviewing district court's Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 ("Rule ___") sentence reduction after the Government failed to so move and noting that the only practical difference between Rule 35(b) and 5K1.1 is a matter of timing

Summary of this case from United States v. Trimm

Opinion

No. 17–6741.

01-08-2018

Gregory SCARPA, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


Summaries of

Scarpa v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 8, 2018
138 S. Ct. 692 (2018)

reviewing district court's Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 ("Rule ___") sentence reduction after the Government failed to so move and noting that the only practical difference between Rule 35(b) and 5K1.1 is a matter of timing

Summary of this case from United States v. Trimm
Case details for

Scarpa v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Gregory SCARPA, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 8, 2018

Citations

138 S. Ct. 692 (2018)
199 L. Ed. 2d 588

Citing Cases

United States v. Trimm

However, if a defendant, prior to being sentenced, has rendered substantial assistance to the Government in…

Rosemond v. United States

Id. Even though the decision does not deal with the refusal of the government to extend a cooperation…