From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saylor v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Sep 2, 1965
278 Ala. 297 (Ala. 1965)

Opinion

6 Div. 221.

June 24, 1965. Rehearing Denied September 2, 1965.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Jefferson County, Alta L. King, J.

Matt H. Murphy, Jr., Birmingham, for petitioner.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Paul T. Gish, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.


As shown by the opinion of the Court of Appeals and the authorities cited therein, the matter of granting a certiorari to correct defects in the record, when such effort to correct the record is made after rendition of judgment and publication of an opinion, is a matter within the discretion of the appellate court.

The Court of Appeals is the court of final appellate jurisdiction. Section 140, Constitution of Alabama 1901; Act No. 121, General Acts of Alabama 1911, p. 95.

In the petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals it is asserted that the Court of Appeals erred, as a matter of law, in denying the motion for a rehearing filed in that court. We do not agree. It was within the discretion of the Court of Appeals as to whether that court would set aside its opinion, set aside the submission of the cause and restore it to the docket. The basis upon which the Court of Appeals denied the application for rehearing is fully set forth in its opinion. We can find no basis upon which this court could justifiably conclude that the Court of Appeals had abused its discretion in the premises.

Writ denied.

LAWSON, GOODWYN, MERRILL and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Saylor v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Sep 2, 1965
278 Ala. 297 (Ala. 1965)
Case details for

Saylor v. State

Case Details

Full title:Author SAYLOR v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Sep 2, 1965

Citations

278 Ala. 297 (Ala. 1965)
177 So. 2d 926

Citing Cases

Woods v. State

In Redwine v. State, 36 Ala.App. 560, 569, 61 So.2d 715, 723, cert. denied, 258 Ala. 196, 61 So.2d 724…

Woods v. State

' (Emphasis added). Further indication of the discretionary nature of a rehearing is found in Saylor v.…