From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saxton v. ACF Industries, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Mar 15, 2001
244 F.3d 830 (11th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

No. 00-11047.

March 15, 2001.

D. Leon Ashford, Bruce J. McKee, Hare, Wynn, Newell Newton, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

J. Bradley Powell, Samuel H. Franklin, Lightfoot, Franklin, White Lucas, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. 98-01719-CV-N-S); Edwin L. Nelson, Judge.

(Opinion January 24, 2001, 239 F.3d 1209, 11th Cir., 2001)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.


BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

Saxton v. ACF Industries, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Mar 15, 2001
244 F.3d 830 (11th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

Saxton v. ACF Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Major SAXTON, Jr., Mary Saxton, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ACF INDUSTRIES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Mar 15, 2001

Citations

244 F.3d 830 (11th Cir. 2001)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Johnson

Smith v. GTE Corp., 236 F.3d 1292, 1302-03 (11th Cir. 2001) (categorically rejecting an "overlooked reason"…

Saxton v. ACF Industries, Inc.

The district court concluded that the Saxtons' third amended complaint against ACF was time-barred because it…