From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santos v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Jan 18, 2012
No. 4D10-4810 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D10-4810

01-18-2012

MICHAEL SANTOS a/k/a MICHAEL MINASIAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Michael Santos a/k/a Michael Minasian, Lake City, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


.

We affirm with prejudice the summary denial of appellant's untimely postconviction motion. The alleged "newly discovered evidence," that jury selection was not transcribed for the direct appeal in 1994, could have been discovered with due diligence within the two-year time limit. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b)(1).

Affirmed. WARNER, POLEN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Stephen A. Rapp, Judge; L.T. Case No. 1992CF015503AXX.

Michael Santos a/k/a Michael Minasian, Lake City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Summaries of

Santos v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Jan 18, 2012
No. 4D10-4810 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Santos v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SANTOS a/k/a MICHAEL MINASIAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

No. 4D10-4810 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 18, 2012)

Citing Cases

Norris v. Spivey

See Rule 3.850(b)(1). See also Santos v. State, ___ So. 3d ___, No. 4D10-4810, 37 Fla. L. Weekly D170, 2012…