From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santi v. Zack Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 18, 1973
287 So. 2d 127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Opinion

No. 73-164.

December 18, 1973.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Shelby Highsmith, J.

Glazer Glazer, Miami, for appellants.

Friedman, Britton Stettin, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.


The single point raised on this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in denying plaintiffs-appellants' motion to amend the complaint during trial. The amendment sought to completely change the basis of the action. It cannot be said that under the circumstances of this case an abuse of discretion has been shown. See Brown v. Montgomery Ward Company, Fla.App. 1971, 252 So.2d 817.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Santi v. Zack Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 18, 1973
287 So. 2d 127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)
Case details for

Santi v. Zack Co.

Case Details

Full title:SAM F. SANTI, INDIVIDUALLY, AND SANTI EQUIPMENT RENTALS, INC., A FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 18, 1973

Citations

287 So. 2d 127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Citing Cases

Universal Ins. Co. of N. Am. v. Sunset 102 Office Park Condo. Ass'n

We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's denial of Universal's request for leave to amend its…

Dimick v. Ray

The cases have analyzed this prejudice element primarily in respect to the defendant's ability to prepare for…