From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanford v. Sanford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 12, 1983
440 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 83-405.

November 2, 1983. Rehearing Denied December 12, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Martin County, Charles E. Smith, J.

Joseph J. DeRoss, Jr., and Alberta S. Widman of Orr DeRoss, Fort Pierce, for appellant.

Robert P. Summers of Summers Makemson, P.A., Stuart, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a dissolution of marriage judgment. We affirm except as to the following matter. The trial court awarded permanent periodic alimony to the Wife in the sum of "80.00 per week or 20% of the Husband's gross income; whichever is greater". The Husband appeals. We reverse and remand with instructions to delete the words and figures "20% of the Husband's gross income; whichever is greater" thereby leaving the award to the Wife simply $80.00 per week. Kangas v. Kangas, 420 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). We do not think the award here operated or was designed to maintain the status quo as was the case in Mills v. Mills, 417 So.2d 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), in that the automatic percentage figure does not take into account factors such as the Wife's needs and other aspects of the Husband's financial condition.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with instructions.

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sanford v. Sanford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 12, 1983
440 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Sanford v. Sanford

Case Details

Full title:JAMES H. SANFORD, APPELLANT, v. MARY IRENE SANFORD, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 12, 1983

Citations

440 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Segall v. Segall

Furthermore, the portion of the alimony award entitling the Wife to 12 percent of the Husband's taxable…

Mirsky v. Mirsky

Upon remand he should hold a new hearing, consider up-to-date evidence and use no "formula" for the setting…