assessing penalties in view of lengthy delay, the frustration and distress of participant, and the deliberate misconduct of administrator
Summary of this case from James v. N.Y. City Dist. CouncilNo. 89-7020.
August 1, 1989.
N.D.Ala., 716 F.Supp. 571.
AFFIRMED
assessing penalties in view of lengthy delay, the frustration and distress of participant, and the deliberate misconduct of administrator
Summary of this case from James v. N.Y. City Dist. Councilassessing penalties in view of the lengthy delay, the frustration and distress of participant, and the deliberate conduct of administrator
Summary of this case from Pagovich v. MoskowitzFull title:Sandlin v. Iron Workers Dist
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Date published: Aug 1, 1989
Other district courts, however, have awarded penalties under § 502(c) without a finding of prejudice to the…
Scott v. Suncoast Beverage Sales, Ltd.The penalty under § 1132 is meant to be in the nature of punitive damages, designed more for the purpose of…