From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 7, 1997
693 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case Nos. 95-2038 95-2336

Opinion filed May 7, 1997.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court of Dade County, Amy N. Dean, Judge.

LOWER TRIBUNAL NOS. 93-33099 94-11270

John E. Bergendahl, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Sylvie Perez Posner, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.


We find, as the State properly concedes, that the trial court erred by sentencing the defendant, Guillermo Sanchez, to a three-year minimum mandatory term for the use of a firearm to run consecutively to the minimum mandatory terms imposed pursuant to the habitual violent offender statute. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing consistent with Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 1995).

The defendant's remaining points lack merit.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

Sanchez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 7, 1997
693 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Sanchez v. State

Case Details

Full title:GUILLERMO SANCHEZ, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 7, 1997

Citations

693 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Tunsil v. State

For that reason it is clear that the mandatory minimum sentences should be concurrent. See Jackson v. State,…

Sanchez v. State

Defendant-appellant Sanchez was convicted of armed robbery and attempted armed robbery. The convictions were…