From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salter v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Oct 2, 2006
3:04cv426/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Oct. 2, 2006)

Opinion

3:04cv426/MCR/MD.

October 2, 2006


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated August 28, 2006. The petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) challenging the convictions and sentences in State of Florida v. Lomax Salter, in the Circuit Court of Escambia County, Florida, case number 98-325 is DENIED and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Salter v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Oct 2, 2006
3:04cv426/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Oct. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Salter v. McDonough

Case Details

Full title:LOMAX SALTER, Petitioner, v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Oct 2, 2006

Citations

3:04cv426/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Oct. 2, 2006)

Citing Cases

Crisp v. United States

See Jury Trial Tr. at 590 ("THE COURT: Mr. Brener, is it your belief that Torry Crisp is going to testify…