From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Safeharbor Emp. v. Velazquez

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 13, 2003
860 So. 2d 984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Summary

holding that workers' compensation claimant's status as an undocumented worker did not preclude him from receiving benefits

Summary of this case from Campos v. Daisy Constr. Co.

Opinion

Case No. 1D02-3380.

Opinion filed October 13, 2003. Rehearing Denied December 11, 2003.

An appeal from a Final Order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC),

Juan A. Bello, Judge David A. Lamont, The Lamont Law Group, P.A., Clearwater and H. George Kagan, Miller, Kagan, Rodriguez Silver, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

Russell A. Dohan, Goldberg, Dohan Katz, L.L.P. and Randy D. Ellison, West Palm Beach, for Appellee.


We are asked to decide whether an illegal alien may receive benefits under Chapter 440, Florida Statutes (2002), in light of Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137, 122 S.Ct. 1275, 152 L.Ed.2d 271 (2002). We find that he can, and affirm.

Safeharbor Employer Services, Inc. argues that Hoffman preempts Florida law, and thus illegal aliens in Florida are precluded from receiving workers' compensation benefits. Hoffman held that pursuant to the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), the National Labor Relations Board lacked authority to award backpay to an illegal alien because he had never been legally authorized to work in the United States, even though he had been unlawfully terminated in violation of the National Labor Relations Act and would have otherwise been entitled to benefits. See id. at 1282.

Although not yet addressed by Florida courts, this issue has been decided by the Supreme Courts of Pennsylvania and Minnesota. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that subsequent to Hoffman, public policy did not exclude an illegal alien from receiving relief under their Workers' Compensation Act. See Reinforced Earth Co. v. W.C.A.B. (Astudillo), 810 A.2d 99 (Pa. 2002). Similarly, the Minnesota Supreme Court recently held IRCA, subsequent to Hoffman, does not preempt a state's authority to award workers' compensation benefits to illegal aliens. See Correa v. Waymouth Farms, Inc., 664 N.W.2d 324 (Minn. 2003).

The Florida Workers' Compensation Act clearly allowed benefits to illegal aliens under Chapter 440 prior to Hoffman. See Cenvill Development Corp. v. Candelo, 478 So.2d 1168, 1170 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); see also Gene's Harvesting v. Rodriguez, 421 So.2d 701, 701 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (holding fact that workers' compensation claimant was illegal alien did not preclude entitlement to benefits for work-related injury). Hoffman does not mandate a different result.

In the absence of an express congressional statement, a state law may still be preempted if that law actually conflicts with federal law, or if federal law so thoroughly occupies a legislative field as to require a reasonable inference that Congress left no room for it to be supplemented by the state. See Harrell v. Fla. Constr. Specialists/AARLA/Agent for FWCIGA, 834 So.2d 352 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). IRCA does not contain express preemption language nor does it so thoroughly occupy the field as to require a reasonable inference that Congress left no room for states to act. Further, since Hoffman found benefits other than backpay to be applicable to illegal aliens, there is no conflict between state and federal law in this case. See Hoffman, 122 S.Ct. at 1285. The United States Supreme Court has stated that workers' compensation is an area where states have authority to regulate under their police powers. See DeCanas v. Bica, 424 U.S. 351, 336, 96 S.Ct. 933, 937, 47 L.Ed.2d 43 (1976). Therefore, we conclude that the Florida legislature's right to enact workers' compensation benefits for illegal aliens is not preempted by federal action. The JCC's award of benefits is

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, C.J., and BROWNING, J., CONCUR.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED


Summaries of

Safeharbor Emp. v. Velazquez

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 13, 2003
860 So. 2d 984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

holding that workers' compensation claimant's status as an undocumented worker did not preclude him from receiving benefits

Summary of this case from Campos v. Daisy Constr. Co.

rejecting the federal law preemption argument because there was no express preemption language, no conflict between state and federal law, and the federal law did not thoroughly occupy the field of law

Summary of this case from Simmons v. State

explaining the right to enact compensation laws allowing illegal aliens to recover is matter for state legislature, and Florida “clearly” allows benefits for illegal aliens

Summary of this case from HDV Construction Systems, Inc. v. Aragon

stating that federal law preempts state law where the state law actually conflicts with the federal law

Summary of this case from DEPT. OF EDUC. v. NYT MGMT. SER

stating that federal law preempts state law where the state law actually conflicts with the federal law

Summary of this case from FLORIDA D.O.E. v. NYT MGMT. SERV.
Case details for

Safeharbor Emp. v. Velazquez

Case Details

Full title:SAFEHARBOR EMPLOYER SERVICES I, Inc., Appellant, v. JUAN CINTO VELAZQUEZ…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 13, 2003

Citations

860 So. 2d 984 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

HDV Construction Systems, Inc. v. Aragon

Candelo Although there is no shortage of debate that can be had on the issue of illegal labor and its effect…

Veliz v. Rental Service Corp. USA, Inc.

Florida law is well settled that workers' compensation benefits extend to undocumented aliens. See Safeharbor…