From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SAD v. PRESTIGE MOTOR CAR IMPORTS

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 6, 2005
904 So. 2d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D04-326.

May 4, 2005. Rehearing Denied July 6, 2005.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge.

Sina Negahbani, for appellant.

Adorno Yoss, P.A., and John J. Shahady, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, SHEPHERD and ROTHENBERG, JJ.


Claudio Sad ("Sad") appeals an adverse final judgment, asserting the trial court erred in denying his motion for leave to amend and add a punitive damages claim to his complaint. We reverse.

Florida courts have consistently held that amendments to complaints should be liberally granted. Susan Fixel, Inc. v. Rosenthal Rosenthal, Inc., 842 So.2d 204 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Lasar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Bachanov, 436 So.2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); see Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.190.

Here, Sad timely filed the motion to amend his complaint to add a punitive damages claim three months before trial. The motion for punitive damages claim dealt with the same facts and circumstances as the underlying case and complaint and would not have prejudiced the defendant in the preparation of its case. Under these circumstances, it was error to deny Sad's motion to amend. Wackenhut Protective Sys., Inc. v. Key Biscayne Commodore Club Condo. I, Inc., 350 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial on all issues.


Summaries of

SAD v. PRESTIGE MOTOR CAR IMPORTS

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 6, 2005
904 So. 2d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

SAD v. PRESTIGE MOTOR CAR IMPORTS

Case Details

Full title:Claudio SAD, Appellant, v. PRESTIGE MOTOR CAR IMPORTS, INC., Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 6, 2005

Citations

904 So. 2d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

South Florida Coastal Electric, Inc. v. Treasures on the Bay II Condo Ass'n

Florida courts, however, “have consistently held that amendments to complaints should be liberally granted.”…