From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rushing v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 24, 1990
561 So. 2d 36 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-840.

May 24, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County; John W. Watson, III, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Fleming Lee; Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal of a guidelines departure sentence in a probation violation case. The sentence imposed exceeded the one-bracket bump-up permitted in probation violation cases.

The case law in Florida has now established that a trial court cannot exceed a one-cell "bump-up" upon revocation of probation. Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla. 1989); State v. Tuthill, 545 So.2d 850 (Fla. 1989); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla. 1989); Maddox v. State, 553 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED for resentencing.

DANIEL, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.


Summaries of

Rushing v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 24, 1990
561 So. 2d 36 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Rushing v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW RUSHING, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 24, 1990

Citations

561 So. 2d 36 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)