Ruise v. State

Full title: JAMALE OMAR RUISE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 19, 2021

310 So. 3d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 5D20-917

01-19-2021

Jamale Omar RUISE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Robert Wesley, Public Defender, and Robert Adams, Assistant Public Defender, Orange, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Wesley, Public Defender, and Robert Adams, Assistant Public Defender, Orange, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

AFFIRMED. See State v. Betz , 815 So. 2d 627, 634 (Fla. 2002) ("[B]ased upon the totality of the circumstances within the perception of the law enforcement officers in the instant case, probable cause to search ... the respondent's vehicle existed."); Butler v. Yusem , 44 So. 3d 102, 105 (Fla. 2010) (defining tipsy coachman doctrine).

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and TRAVER, JJ., concur.