From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruise v. Etheridge

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 1, 2012
95 So. 3d 896 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 1D12–1215.

2012-06-1

Anthony RUISE, Petitioner, v. Michelle Y. ETHERIDGE, Florida Dept. of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement, Respondents.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction. Anthony Ruise, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and William H. Branch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.


Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
Anthony Ruise, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and William H. Branch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted. Within a reasonable time, not to exceed 20 days from issuance of mandate in this cause, the circuit court shall comply with the dictates of Section 78.065, Florida Statutes, by either directing the clerk to issue a writ of replevin pursuant to Section 78.065(1), or by issuing an order to show cause complying with the requirements of Section 78.065(2). Because we are confident that the circuit court will comply, we withhold issuance of the formal writ.

BENTON, C.J., THOMAS and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ruise v. Etheridge

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 1, 2012
95 So. 3d 896 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Ruise v. Etheridge

Case Details

Full title:Anthony RUISE, Petitioner, v. Michelle Y. ETHERIDGE, Florida Dept. of…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jun 1, 2012

Citations

95 So. 3d 896 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)