From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruggirello v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 19, 1990
566 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 90-0171.

August 15, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 19, 1990.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Robert W. Tyson, Jr., Judge.

Peter Louis Ruggirello, Raiford, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Lynn Waxman, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.


The trial court denied appellant's petition because it was untimely filed. The appellant's pleadings were placed in the hands of state prison authorities well in advance of the required filing date but were not date-stamped into the clerk's office until after the filing deadline. I would follow the rule of the federal courts and allow the date of delivery to prison officials to control. See Fallen v. United States, 378 U.S. 139, 84 S.Ct. 1689, 12 L.Ed.2d 760 (1964); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).


Summaries of

Ruggirello v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 19, 1990
566 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Ruggirello v. State

Case Details

Full title:PETER LOUIS RUGGIRELLO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 19, 1990

Citations

566 So. 2d 30 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Sparre v. State

We recognize that our opinion today recedes from and overrules earlier precedent in this jurisdiction. The…

Haag v. State

We recognize that our opinion today recedes from and overrules earlier precedent in this jurisdiction. The…