From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roulhac v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 16, 1999
746 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-2137.

Opinion filed December 16, 1999.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County, Dedee S. Costello, Judge.

Mary Jean Roulhac, Pro Se, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Although the trial court incorrectly found that appellant's claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel should have been raised on direct appeal, we affirm the denial of appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion because she failed to allege the prejudicial effect of counsel's alleged ineffectiveness. See Gaskins v. State, 737 So.2d 509, n. 13 (Fla. 1999); Daniels v. State, 701 So.2d 1222, 1223 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); see also Robinson v. State, 393 So.2d 33, 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (holding that, if a trial court's order can be upheld under any theory revealed by the appellate record, affirmance is proper even if the order was entered for a different or erroneous reason).

BOOTH, MINER and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Roulhac v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 16, 1999
746 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Roulhac v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARY JEAN ROULHAC, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 16, 1999

Citations

746 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)